Study Summary

Running head : DISCRETIONARY PROFILINGDiscretionary Profiling as a Systemic ProblemNAMECOLLEGEPROFEESORCLASSDiscretionary Profiling as a Systemic ProblemIn her give voice Racial Profiling and in-migration Law Enforcement Rounding Up of Usual Suspects in the Latino Community Mary Romero uses a critical race theory lens to analyze the face to face and community cost that Mexican Americans must pay as a result of racial compose by in-migration authorities (448 . These costs include micro- (personal level ) and macro- (group level ) aggressions much(prenominal) as immigration stops and searches (450 , the exclusionary use of urban spaces (453 , as well as hate crimes or the decrease of political science funding and services to their communities (450 . More importantly , however , Romero argues that by subjecting Mexican Am ericans and other rationalized Latinos to the constant fear of harassment and possible legal consequences (including deportation , immigration raids function as a policing practice to maintain and reinforce subordinated status among working-class US citizens and legal residents of Mexican ancestry (450-51 . Moreover , because they be tie non on the basis of systematic or haphazard checking of assignment but rather based on the armorial baby buggy of darker-skinned individuals in ethnic cultural spaces marked by Mexican-owned businesses , agencies pause bilingual services , and neighborhoods with the highest concentration of poor and working-class Latinos the enforcement of American immigration fairnesss results in the embodiment of a figurative b within the skin of Mexican Americans and Latinos , the creation of a petit apartheid and the depersonalisation of a Spanish-speaking landscape of suspicion (453Romero s position on discretionary racial pen is highl y convincing . The nix effects - both in t! erms of macro- and micro-aggressions - that discretionary profiling by immigration officials can arrest on darker-skinned populations croak major civil-rights and human-rights violations and her implicit call to action against them is very have .

Additionally , her demonstration that historically immigration law of natures have been selectively enforced in response to the changing economic needs of American businesspeople (449-50 demonstrates that immigration laws have functioned primarily not to enforce law and , but rather to keep lighter-skinned Americans spue and Mexican Americans and other Latinos subdued and afraid to venture into being spaces . Her account , however , seems to imply too much perpetration on the part of immigration officials . While the actions of many agents of the in-migration and Naturalization Services (now the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE ) are certainly far from blameless , it seems unlikely that , as Romero puts it , the INS is in the position of having to negotiate an adequate flow of undocumented toil to meet urban capitalist needs while maintaining the path of controlling immigration (453 . Rather , it seems more plausible that the law has been constructed in such a way as to return those who created it - primarily wealthy white males - to the disadvantage of those who did not . The privileging of change (453 ) white citizens and their economic wellbeing can thus be seen as a product of the functioning of certain prepossess laws , rather than as the product of biased actions by a certain group of...If you want to get a adult essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay